The Purdue University trustees have approved a tuition freeze …
File Photo: Classroom.
File Photo: Classroom.
State health officials are urging people to be careful as they …
Updated: Wednesday, 21 Nov 2012, 2:36 PM EST
Published : Wednesday, 21 Nov 2012, 9:45 AM EST
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- UPDATE Nov. 22, 3:30 p.m. -- Indiana Supreme Court justices weighing the legality of the nation's largest school voucher program made clear during a packed hearing Wednesday that the program's fate may rest on whether it primarily benefits students' parents or the religious institutions that run private schools.
The five justices prodded lawyers for both sides on the vouchers' consequences as they heard a constitutional challenge to the 2011 law under which more than 9,000 students have switched from public to private schools with help from state funds. The program was pushed by Gov. Mitch Daniels and is considered a model of conservative Republicans' approach to overhauling education.
Solicitor General Thomas Fisher, defending the law, said the vouchers allow parents to send their children to private schools they otherwise couldn't afford. He said parents, not the state, decide which schools receive public voucher money.
"Any money that ends up in the coffers of religious institutions is there at the discretion of the parent," Fisher said during the hour-long hearing.
But John West, the Washington attorney handling the court challenge pressed by the Indiana State Teachers Association, said that virtually all of the voucher money goes to schools whose primary purpose is to promote the teachings of their affiliated churches.
"Here, the state is directly paying for the teaching of religion," West said. "Many of these schools describe themselves as ministries of the churches they're affiliated with," he added.
The Indiana case is being closely watched because the vouchers are available to middle class students. Voucher programs in other states are generally limited to low-income students or those in failing schools. Conservative Republicans say the vouchers offer families more choices and will boost education by giving public schools greater incentive to improve. Critics contend the vouchers could cripple public schools by diverting desperately needed funds.
In considering the law, "The problem for me is `the benefit of,"' said Indiana Chief Justice Brent Dickson, referring the wording of the state constitution, which precludes spending state funds for the benefit of religious institutions. Dickson and other justices repeatedly probed the nuances of that phrase's meaning -- including whether it applied to other government services or to state scholarships that help students attend church-affiliated universities like Notre Dame.
"Why is that permissible, and this is not?" Dickson asked. He also noted that in 1851, when the constitution was ratified, most of the state's schools were private and "the Bible was the textbook."
West argued that in those other cases, the state wasn't directly funding religious activity.
Justice Stephen David focused on whether the state will have shifted to a religious education system if the vouchers drain much of the resources from public schools.
"What if 97 percent of kids end up going to religious schools?" he asked Fisher. "That is altering the state of education."
"You still have decisions being made by the parents," Fisher insisted. He also said the question was hypothetical.
However, Fort Wayne Community Schools Board President Mark GiaQuinta said after the hearing that school vouchers already had damaged the state's largest public school district.
"We have lost $7 million of our budget to vouchers," he told reporters. The district's 2013 budget is $279 million.
The number of students using the vouchers has increased since the law went into effect. The system was championed by Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett. But Bennett's Democratic opponent, Glenda Ritz, defeated him in the Nov. 6 election after arguing that the vouchers and other changes were damaging education in Indiana.
----
Follow Charles Wilson on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CharlesDWilson
------------------------
INITIAL ARTICLE, Nov. 22, 3:13 a.m.
A sweeping debate over the nation's largest school voucher program, which contributed to the ouster of an official widely regarded as a national champion of conservative education policy, moves Wednesday from the ballot box to an Indiana courtroom.
Opponents led by Indiana's teachers union are asking the Indiana Supreme Court to overturn a local judge's ruling earlier this year upholding the 2011 law, which was a centerpiece of a conservative education overhaul pushed by Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels and Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett. A hearing is set for Wednesday morning, though there is no timeline for a decision.
The Indiana voucher program is the biggest test yet of an idea sought for years by conservative Republicans, who say it offers families more choices and gives public schools greater incentive to improve.
Unlike voucher programs in other states that are limited to poor families and failing school districts, the Indiana subsidies are open to a much broader range of people, including parents with a
household income up to nearly $64,000 for a family of four. Families that take part in the School Choice Scholarship Program can have up to 90 percent of their tuition costs covered.
State education officials said Tuesday the program has doubled in size from its first year, with more than 9,000 students now participating.
"We believe the program is constitutional and in the best interest of students," said state Department of Education spokesman Alex Damron.
Opponents, including the Indiana State Teachers Association, disagree, saying 99 percent of the schools receiving vouchers are religious schools and that taxpayers shouldn't be funding schools whose main purpose is promoting their church's beliefs. The union also says the program funnels tax funds from public education into private schools in violation of the intent of the lawmakers who wrote the state constitution.
Supporters argue that the state isn't directly funding religious schools -- parents who receive vouchers are choosing where to send their kids. They also say that barring religious schools from receiving vouchers would require Indiana to violate its constitution by setting limits on the amount of faith participating schools are allowed to teach their students.
Jennifer Bruggen, 39, and Dan Bruggen, 42, of Indianapolis, hope the Supreme Court upholds the law.
The couple visited the Statehouse on Tuesday with their daughter Hanna, 12, who received a voucher to attend Cardinal Ritter High School on the city's west side.
The Bruggens said they both attended large schools and appreciated the smaller class sizes Hanna has now compared with when she attended Indianapolis public schools.
"That opportunity for a smaller class environment helps out with what we feel is a better education for our children," Dan Bruggen said.
The plaintiffs in the voucher case include Indianapolis school librarian Glenda Ritz, who defeated Bennett in the Nov. 6 election after campaigning against the voucher program and other policies she claimed undermined public education.
Ritz told The Associated Press on Tuesday that she would drop out of the legal challenge after Wednesday's hearing and before she takes office in January.
Ritz said she believes the voucher program is unconstitutional but said she has a duty to follow state law as the new schools superintendent.
"I have a responsibility to uphold the law. I don't intend to not uphold the law," she said.
Ritz said she would have no power to modify or repeal the program as state superintendent.
"That's up to voters," she said.
----------
Associated Press writer Tom LoBianco in Indianapolis contributed to this report.
----------
Follow Charles Wilson on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CharlesDWilson
Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. No racially charged comments. If it's not something you would say to someone's face, it's most likely inappropriate. Please comment on the subject of the story itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Repeat offenders will be banned from making future comments. Keep it civil, folks! WANE is not responsible for the content posted in this comment section.
Advertisement