A federal appeals court ruled that an Ind. law banning sex offenders from Facebook is unconstitutional; court said the "blanket ban" was too broad.

Do you agree with the court's decision?
See Results
Error: Please select a vote.Error: Please enter the text from the image above.Error: No vote was submitted. Please try again.Error: Our log shows that you have already voted once.
  • Crime News
Indy fires 2 officials in alleged kickback plot
Indy fires officials in alleged plot

Two city of Indianapolis officials have been fired amid …

Video shows robbers shoving clerk down at Sunoco gas station
Video shows robbers shoving clerk down

Police are hoping for more info after releasing a video of men …

Police searching for suspect who used stolen credit card
Police search for fraud suspect

Police are searching for the suspect who used a stolen credit …

Judge sentences man to 8 years for 12th DUI
12th DUI results in 8-year sentence

Authorities in northeast Ohio say a 70-year-old man has been …

Man who shot, killed girlfriend pleads guilty
Man who killed girlfriend pleads guilty

A man pleaded guilty to shooting, killing his girlfriend while …

Advertisement

Court: Sex offender Facebook ban unconstitutional

Updated: Wednesday, 23 Jan 2013, 2:39 PM EST
Published : Wednesday, 23 Jan 2013, 12:36 PM EST

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- An Indiana law that bans registered sex offenders from using Facebook and other social networking sites that can be accessed by children is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The 7th U.S. Circuit of Appeals in Chicago overturned a federal judge's decision upholding the law, saying the state was justified in trying to protect children but that the "blanket ban" went too far by restricting free speech.

The 2008 law "broadly prohibits substantial protected speech rather than specifically targeting the evil of improper communications to minors," the judges wrote.

"The goal of deterrence does not license the state to restrict far more speech than necessary to target the prospective harm," they said in a 20-page decision.

The judges noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has also struck down laws that restricted the constitutional right to freedom of expression, such as one that sought to ban leafleting on the premise that it would prevent the dropping of litter.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt ruled in June that the state has a strong interest in protecting children and found that social networking had created a "virtual playground for sexual predators to lurk." She noted that everything else on the Internet remained open to those who have been convicted of sex offenses.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed the class-action suit on behalf of a man who served three years for child exploitation and other sex offenders who are restricted by the ban even though they are no longer on probation.

Courts have long allowed states to place restrictions on convicted sex offenders who have completed their sentences, controlling where many live and work and requiring them to register with police. But the ACLU contended that even though the Indiana law is only intended to protect children from online sexual predators, social media websites are virtually indispensable. The group said the ban prevents sex offenders from using the websites for legitimate political, business and religious purposes.

The ACLU applauded the decision.

"Indiana already has a law on the books that prohibits inappropriate sexual contacts with children," including penalties for online activities, ACLU legal director Ken Falk said. "This law sought to criminalize completely innocent conduct that has nothing to do with children."

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said his office would review the ruling before deciding on the next step.

Federal judges have barred similar laws in Nebraska and Louisiana. Louisiana legislators passed a new, narrower law last year that requires sex offenders to identify themselves on Facebook and similar sites. A federal judge struck down part of Nebraska's law last October.
------
Follow Charles Wilson on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CharlesDWilson

Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. No racially charged comments.  If  it's not something you would say to someone's face, it's most likely inappropriate. Please comment on the subject of the story itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Repeat offenders will be banned from making future comments.  Keep it civil, folks! WANE is not responsible for the content posted in this comment section.

  • Comments (login required)
Advertisement
  • Photo Gallery

Mug shots in the news

Mug shots provided by area law enforcement agencies in northeast Indiana and northwest Ohio.

Advertisement
  • Photo Gallery

Celebrity mug shots

They may be stars, but that doesn't mean they're above the law.

Advertisement