• Photo
David Delagrange

David Delagrange was charged in connection with using a camera installed in his shoe to look up the dresses of girls and women at Castleton mall back in February of 2010.

  • Crime News
Police say trucker had BAC of .26
Police say trucker had BAC of .26

Police arrested a semi driver Tuesday morning in Grant County …

Suspect spit on police officer after arrest
Police: Suspect spit on officer

Police have arrested the man they say used a meat tenderizer …

Excise police find 1,175 bootleg DVDs in Evansville store
Police find 1,175 bootleg DVDs in shop

Excise police who were serving a search warrant at an …

Teen's smirk earns him maximum sentence in slaying
Teen's smirk earns him maximum sentence

A South Bend teenager who angered a judge by smirking during …

Officer shoots man outside NW Ind. health clinic
Officer shoots man outside of clinic

A northwestern Indiana police officer has shot a man while was …

Advertisement

"Upskirt" peeper conviction overturned

Updated: Friday, 25 Jan 2013, 5:06 PM EST
Published : Friday, 25 Jan 2013, 2:57 PM EST

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (WANE) - The Indiana Court of Appeals has overturned the conviction of a Fort Wayne man who admitted to using a camera installed in his shoe to look up the dresses of girls and women.

According to court documents, David DeLagrange went to the Castleton Square Mall in Indianapolis on February 27, 2010 with a video camera attached to his shoe that he controlled via an apparatus in his pants.  DeLagrange was able to record images underneath the skirts of several females, four of whom were minors.

A trial court convicted DeLagrange on four counts of Child Exploitation.  He was sentenced to six months in prison in March, 2012.

According to court documents, DeLagrange appealed his conviction arguing that his actions did not constitute Child Exploitation because they could not be considered "sexual conduct by a child."

The Appeals Court agreed, noting that the statute for child exploitation addresses videotape of any performance or incident that includes "sexual conduct" by a child under 18 years of age.

In its ruling, the Appeals Court found the State provided no evidence the victims exhibited their genitals or intended to satisfy anyone's sexual desire and therefore the trial court should have rendered a not guilty verdict.

At the time of his arrest, officers said DeLagrange, an engineer, had a very sophisticated camera and audio recording system attached to his right shoe and controls for video and audio in his pockets which were wired to the shoe through his pants.

NewsChannel 15 is working to find out If DeLagrange could face any other charges.

Ground rules for posting comments: No profanity or personal attacks. No racially charged comments.  If  it's not something you would say to someone's face, it's most likely inappropriate. Please comment on the subject of the story itself. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your post. Repeat offenders will be banned from making future comments.  Keep it civil, folks! WANE is not responsible for the content posted in this comment section.

  • Comments (login required)
Advertisement
  • Photo Gallery

Mug shots in the news

Mug shots provided by area law enforcement agencies in northeast Indiana and northwest Ohio.

Advertisement
  • Photo Gallery

Celebrity mug shots

They may be stars, but that doesn't mean they're above the law.

Advertisement